Thursday, March 19, 2009
Outside Reading
Neville finds himself in Vegas. He doesn't really like it here, and thinks that "Vegas was a black hole" (Bock 104). They meet a girl who happens to be into strange things, like conspiracy theories. This seems to be quite strange. Every now and then, Neville and everyone else seem to pick up another character. This probably diverts attention away from Neville in the plot, and focuses on the overall story instead. Also, each character happens to have their own defining characteristics that make each of them different.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Outside Reading
The family is continuing to look for Neville as they try every possibility to locate their child in the whole state of Nevada. They tried to use child search groups but didn't work. Lorraine also posted multiple ads to find Neville. However, this isn't working, and she keeps asking herself questions and looking for clues. She starts to suspect that he may be a runaway. I guess this makes some sense, as it is a desperate mother looking for any answer.
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Ourside Reading
Lorraine, the mother of Neville, continues to grieve about the missing Neville. She believes that she has failed him and isn't doing enough. In fact, they have the resources to support him, but try to look at the positive side to losing the child, as it happens to be so that Neville's lack of presence would put less strain on the family's resources (Bock 45). This apparently indicates that the family feels insecure about losing him and that they try to find a positive outcome. The deal is though, the parents have lost most of their hope, and are having trouble filling in his sense, which would make sense in a real life scenario.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Outside Reading
Lorraine continues to find some hope, finding her son's sneaker tracks in the desert (13). Either this is redeeming her hope that he is alive, or her denial, trying to pretend he is still alive. The tracks in the desert also might hint that she is being desperate and delusional, as the tracks might not even actually be there. The Parents still have discontent for the investigators, as they can't get anything done. Meanwhile, Wendy Whitebread is shown again, comic books galore (14). This shows that Neville can put his past behind him, and just live another leisurely life by himself and other unrestricted youths. This, of course, is just begging for trouble.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Outside Reading
It has been extremely hot, a "hundred and five for the ninety-ninth straight day" (7). That's what Newell thinks, and the 99 days of heat probably stands for the days he has been missing. He also seems to have been used to the fact that he couldn't find his parents. Newell, Kenny and Beiderbixxe, the cartoonist, meet at a Saturday talk in a comics store called Amazin’ Stories, where Beiderbixxe has come to discuss his illustrated series, “Wendy Whitebread, Undercover Slut” (8). He is part of a group of mischievous guys. The adult themes have already been made in this book, behind the dirty comic "Wendy White-bread, Undercover Slut." This shows what people end up viewing away from their parents authority. A child who ended up without their parents was dragged into this, and might end up in a deeper hole, just like in real life. However, he seems to have adapted quite well to his environment, and has found a residence with a group of others. The gang of kids is definitely up to no good.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Outside Reading: Beautiful Children
We are introduced to the Ewing family. Lincoln Ewing and Lorraine Ewing are distraught by the fact that their twelve-year-old child is missing. They have to acknowledge the fact that "nobody can say how long a child will be missing" (Bock 5). It seems to make sense that parents would be worried, but the fact that they question hope means that they don't really see much that would come out of the situation now. Lincoln Ewing searched endlessly for leads that would help find his son, Newell, but was unsuccessful. Thus he pondered "What was left of his son? What did he have?" (Bock 6).
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Outside Reading
(Due to the fact that this *is* the last required post, things may be missing (i.e. President Eisenhower)
The war was almost over, just Japan and the U.S. There was a great question of choosing to drop THE bomb over Japan. Eisenhower happened to depressed at this time. He was against the dropping of the atom bomb (Ambrose 426). Once again, I wonder what happened to Eisenhower's rationality, as if the U.S. were to take Japan in a full land invasion, countless lives would be lost. Then again, with the bomb countless lives would be lost as well. During this plotting, he took multiple trips to assess the damage done in Europe. He thought at first that Germany had suffered the worst of the war. However, when he flew to Russia, he did not see "a single house standing intact from the Russian-Polish border to Moscow. Not one" (426). I assume that this would change Eisenhower's mindset on the bomb, and it did, as it further showed the horrors of war to him. The bombing was done, and what happened...happened.
Later in his life, Eisenhower would overcome other obstacles, like the McCarthy deal against him. Of course, he managed to shrug this off. He, as President, accomplished many reforms. And as for his effort in the war, he is viewed as a hero by many.
The war was almost over, just Japan and the U.S. There was a great question of choosing to drop THE bomb over Japan. Eisenhower happened to depressed at this time. He was against the dropping of the atom bomb (Ambrose 426). Once again, I wonder what happened to Eisenhower's rationality, as if the U.S. were to take Japan in a full land invasion, countless lives would be lost. Then again, with the bomb countless lives would be lost as well. During this plotting, he took multiple trips to assess the damage done in Europe. He thought at first that Germany had suffered the worst of the war. However, when he flew to Russia, he did not see "a single house standing intact from the Russian-Polish border to Moscow. Not one" (426). I assume that this would change Eisenhower's mindset on the bomb, and it did, as it further showed the horrors of war to him. The bombing was done, and what happened...happened.
Later in his life, Eisenhower would overcome other obstacles, like the McCarthy deal against him. Of course, he managed to shrug this off. He, as President, accomplished many reforms. And as for his effort in the war, he is viewed as a hero by many.
Outside Reading
Eisenhower was preparing for D-Day. He was secluded from his wife for another period of time. Every now and then during the planning of D-Day, events would come up that would hinder the process. An example of this is that during May 29,1944, he received a message that "indicated the Germans were reinforcing the area where the American paratroopers were going to drop" (Ambrose 302). I don't know how they fixed this, but it would be pretty hard to re-coordinate such an operation like this. However, Eisenhower decided to continue with the action. This surprised me as Eisenhower's past decisions took into account the risks that would be involved, along with a more rational approach, and now he wants to charge in like this. I guess that is what war does.
D-Day was soon coming into effect. However, weather conditions delayed the siege, like high winds and bad tides (Ambrose 306). This led to further postponement later on. Couldn't they have planned better for this kind of situation? Anyway, the operation took place on June 6. The Allies had seized control of the beaches, and broke Hitler's Atlantic wall with minimal costs and lives lost (Ambrose 310). I am personally surprised at the success of this operation, due to the size of it and how bad of a position the Allies were in.
D-Day was soon coming into effect. However, weather conditions delayed the siege, like high winds and bad tides (Ambrose 306). This led to further postponement later on. Couldn't they have planned better for this kind of situation? Anyway, the operation took place on June 6. The Allies had seized control of the beaches, and broke Hitler's Atlantic wall with minimal costs and lives lost (Ambrose 310). I am personally surprised at the success of this operation, due to the size of it and how bad of a position the Allies were in.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Outside reading.
For Eisenhower, World War II was building up. He was a commanding officer, and promoted to major general (temporarily) (Ambrose 144). I find this deal weird. Eisenhower keeps getting promoted, but demoted in the near future. Why is not possible just to give someone a rank and let them keep it? Anyway, Eisenhower had 107 officers working under hi in April as part of the Operations Division. The main resource he needed for his job of planning was intelligence/reconnaissance (Ambrose 145). He continued to work his way up, impressing generals. He would take some non-aggressive measures, like avoiding to send a bunch of troops to Northern Ireland(Ambrose 147). He did later build an offensive when the Germans were breaking further into Europe and assigned attacks in mid-1942 (190). He continued to control the timing of when things were done. Things weren't high stakes, yet.
Eisenhower had worked with Winston Churchill to plan the taking of Northern Africa and shifting away from France. The movement took place during November (202). He made a deal with Francois Darlan that the French would support Eisenhower in return for Darlan earning a politcal title (208). I really don't see why one would give resources for a minor political position. Apparently, it must have been more important that it seemed. This "Darlan Deal" was harshly criticized, but had to be done. Darlan was soon assassinated (215). I guess it makes sense, given the "sale" of a politcal office. Eisenhower continued the African campaign, despite this turmoil. The campaign finally ended after six months, with drastic costs: 10,820 men dead, 39,575 wounds, 21415 missing/captured, but a victory is a victory (237). This shows the resilience that a leader must have, one that can tolerate deaths, and just brush them off as "acceptable losses."
Eisenhower had worked with Winston Churchill to plan the taking of Northern Africa and shifting away from France. The movement took place during November (202). He made a deal with Francois Darlan that the French would support Eisenhower in return for Darlan earning a politcal title (208). I really don't see why one would give resources for a minor political position. Apparently, it must have been more important that it seemed. This "Darlan Deal" was harshly criticized, but had to be done. Darlan was soon assassinated (215). I guess it makes sense, given the "sale" of a politcal office. Eisenhower continued the African campaign, despite this turmoil. The campaign finally ended after six months, with drastic costs: 10,820 men dead, 39,575 wounds, 21415 missing/captured, but a victory is a victory (237). This shows the resilience that a leader must have, one that can tolerate deaths, and just brush them off as "acceptable losses."
Saturday, January 10, 2009
CNN is super liberal
After watching Lou Dobbs for one whole hour (yeah, I made it), I have learned of the annoying bias of CNN (The most trusted name in news? :O) Lou Dobbs talked about the following for the hour: Madoff/the huge Ponzi scheme and especially how the government failed to detect it, salmonella food recall and how the FDA isn't doing their job, how Obama will fix everything, and how Sarah Palin is inexperienced (a little too late now?). So to comment on each: Lou, the government fails. So what? It's because of all those liberals. Let me put it this way: do you want a government that someone works, or no government. Yes, Lou Dobbs is an anarchist! Anyway, Lou Dobbs spends his time bashing on how the SEC failed to detect this. Lou, could YOU figure this one out? Could any other government figure this out? The answer is a shocking NO. At least those victimized will get their socialist security checks. Onto the salmonella (that's in Minnesota). Lou complains that the government couldn't detect the contaminated peanut butter in time. Um, liberal exaggeration. I'm pretty sure the government cleaned up this mess within a week. Besides, it's like Sinclair's "Jungle" and if the government weren't here, Lou, you'd be dead. So learn to appreciate your government, and how Obama will give me your plasma TV.
Friday, January 2, 2009
Eisenhower returned to Union Station in Washington, in which he then went to the War Department. He was debriefed about the whole situation involving the Pacific, including the Phillipines and Pearl Harbor, where Eisenhower admitted that it wouldn't be possible to get reinforcements to the Phillipines before the Japanese would take over (Ambrose 133). This shows that Eisenhower would accept defeat, and wasn't some kind of egomaniac that wouldn't take "no" for an answer. However, Eisenhower's mindset of taking losses didn't appeal to MacArthur, which caused Eisenhower to be irritated. Eisenhower also got mad at the Navy for just planning on fighting by itself, not listening for orders to build aircraft carriers, but just having a large fleet of warships (Ambrose 141). This shows that Eisenhower is a rational person who believes in teamwork but doesn't like ignorance and not what is best.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)